By Ferit Güven
Decolonizing Democracy: Intersections of Philosophy and Postcolonial Theory analyzes the idea that and the discourse of democracy. Ferit Güven demonstrates how democracy is deployed as a neo-colonial device to self-discipline and additional subjugate previously colonized peoples and areas. The e-book explains why expanding democratization of the political house within the final 3 many years produced an expanding dissatisfaction and alienation from the method of governance, instead of a contentment as one may need anticipated from "the rule of the people.” Decolonizing Democracy aims to supply a conceptual reaction to the difficulty of democracy in modern international. With either a different scope and argument, this ebook will entice either philosophy and political technological know-how students, in addition to these all for postcolonial experiences, cultural stories, and peace studies.
Read Online or Download Decolonizing Democracy: Intersections of Philosophy and Postcolonial Theory PDF
Best war & peace books
The center East, a region infamous for political violence and a democratic deficit, boasts a wealthy yet little-known historical past of nonviolent civilian-led struggles for rights and freedoms. Ordinary Egyptians, Palestinians, Turks, Israelis, Iranians, Kuwaitis and different heart Easterners have, during the last century, used "weapons" together with boycotts, moves, demonstrations, sit-ins, and other methods of civil disobedience and noncooperation to courageously challenge entrenched strength and to strengthen democratic self-rule.
This compelling e-book tells the inspirational tales of guys and girls who fought for peace, freedom, equality, and human rights through the 20th century. those brave participants contain prime figures equivalent to Mahatma Gandhi, Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt, Martin Luther King Jr. , Nelson Mandela, VOclav Havel, and Mikhail Gorbachev, in addition to Nobel Prize winners Aung San Suu Kyi, Andrei Sakharov, and Muhammad Yunus.
Enlightened warfare investigates the a number of and complicated interactions among battle and Enlightenment suggestion. even supposing the Enlightenment is regularly pointed out with the beliefs of growth, everlasting peace, cause, and self-determination, Enlightenment discourse spread out in the course of a interval of lengthy eu struggle from the Seven Years' struggle to the Napoleonic conquest of Europe.
"I hugely suggest [Addicted to battle] to an individual who's attracted to studying the reality approximately US wars. "—Glenn Greenwald, writer of No position to conceal: Edward Snowden, The NSA and The U. S. Surveillance State"This is crucial comedian publication ever written. . . . it's my desire that you just learn this booklet and go it alongside to as many of us as you could.
- Social Trust, Anarchy, and International Conflict
- Dynamics of Asymmetric Territorial Conflict: The Evolution of Patience
- Shadows of War: Violence, Power, and International Profiteering in the Twenty-First Century
- Negotiating Peace in Deeply Divided Societies: A Set of Simulations
- Common Ground: The Story of Greenham
- Cycles in US Foreign Policy since the Cold War
Additional resources for Decolonizing Democracy: Intersections of Philosophy and Postcolonial Theory
Yet how does this place remain empty? Is this emptiness guaranteed through liberalism, or pluralism? Therefore, it is a fundamentally misguided attempt to write a critique of democracy, as it is an impossible concept, which ironically strengthens its case for legitimacy, by becoming a moving target. Perhaps the attempt to write about the concept of democracy itself is misguided. It seems that various conceptual problems associated with the idea of democracy apply to Western liberal democracy. Yet this focus does not weaken my contention concerning the paradoxes of democracy itself.
Why could equality attributed to Athenians by Socrates not be generalized to other states? The answer to this question is crucial, because it complicates and renders impossible the universalistic aspirations of democracy. Socrates provides the answer. The equality requires homogeneity. It is only because Athenians is conceived of (or rather fictionally projected) as homogeneous by Socrates; it is possible to conceive them as equals. This is Socrates’s explanation of why democracy can only function in Athens, because the main problem of democracy is that it treats not only equals equally, but also nonequals equally.
If democracy always protects itself undemocratically, why is it that democratic regimes do not always (empirically) protect themselves by suppressing, their opposition? Here one should make a distinction between the discourse of democracy and the actual decisions made within democracy. First, even when democratic discourse never explicitly defends the repression of opposition (in fact it sometimes does, but this is mostly a sign of weakness), democratic societies always exclude what they consider to be outside the rules of democracy.